Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David Emerling
I have researched this and there is some disagreement on this.
Let's assume OBR:
On a force play, a runner overslides a base and never touches it. The runner is tagged out trying to scramble back to the base. See the force play is removed once the runner "passed" the base, the tag was a time play. That means that any runs that scored in the interim - count!
Can the defense now make an appeal that the runner missed the base for an "advantageous fourth out" in order to nullify the run?
On that there is disagreement!
* * *
It seems to me, from what I could gather, that under FED and NCAA, in the same situation - the defense could tag the base while the runner is still attempting to scramble back and appeal that the base was missed and gain the out. It is unique to OBR that the runner must be tagged on a force play once they have passed (and missed) the base.
David Emerling
Memphis, TN
|
I would allow the advantageous fourth out in all codes and take my chances with any protest committee. Why should the offense benefit from the (still) missed base?