Thread: Eager Partner?
View Single Post
  #46 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 21, 2008, 11:02am
celebur celebur is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skahtboi
Apparently you are still missing the intent of my posts. Yet, I can think of nothing else to make you understand.
Actually, you just did it (see below).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skahtboi
You are obviously committed to the belief that I was jumping "all over those who deigned to say they didn't like it." I have "jumped all over" no one, and that statement on your part is the only hyperbole I see in this discussion. I was merely supporting, originally, the stance of kcg NC2Ablu who made mention that the signal, which for the record I am not a fan of, is a legitimate signal as far as NCAA mechanics go. Wade had said he didn't need any secret signals, so I was informing him, in my way, that this is in fact not a "secret signal," but an approved mechanic so far as the NCAA goes. This is "proper" umpire to umpire communication.
My apologies for both missing your point and making you explain it (and also my thanks that you did explain it).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skahtboi
Now insofar as your statement, "Note, however, that I do not criticize someone who uses that ear signal. As you say, it's an approved mechanic (at least for NCAA)," the following would seem to be contradictory:
Quote:
Originally Posted by celebur
Or how about:

U1: Partner, everything by the book.
U2: (touches ear).
That was levity. Nothing more.
Reply With Quote