[TussAgee11]

If you recall the thread about the coach's INT after OBS.

Compare it to this. What principles carry over and what do not:

2 runners are beginning to round 3rd when F5 obstructs the preceeding runner (R2). The runner's are so close that a) The following runner (R1) passes the preceeding runner because he can't stop in time or b) the following runner has to slow down to avoid passing.

Seems to me in both situations we have a direct result of OBS, unlike in the coach's INT sitch.

Therefore in a, allow play to continue and protect R2 where you need to, in order to nullify the act of OBS. Also in order to nullify, ignore the passing.

In both a and b, you might need to start protecting R1 (following runner) to a base as well, as he might slow down in order to allow the preceeding runner to repass.

I feel confident in these interps.

However, what if R1 (following runner) does not slow down and just keeps on trucking all the way to home. Could we have the R1 scoring before R2 and allow it if we choose to nullify the act of OBS???

This is the stuff that makes s***houses.