Quote:
|
Originally Posted by socalreff
Yes. Two in a row should have been intentional. Away from the ball and they were INTENTIONALLY fouling the worst free throw shooter. The no-calls allowed Kentucky to get back in the game as he missed 3 out of 4.
|
No, they were STRATEGICALLY fouling the worst free throw shooter. If the ref thinks it's the sort of action that might have been committed in an attempt to break up the play, rather than a grab from behind or a bear hug type foul, it doesn't HAVE to be called Intentional.