Quote:
|
Originally Posted by zebraman
This old justification.
I always find it interesting how many officials watch ball and then call it "being aware of what else is happening on the court." There is a difference between being aware and officiating someone else's area.
If the C was helping on the press, there had to be other matchups than what was happening right in front of the T. I don't see how the C can see something right in front of the T by the feet if the C is doing his job and watching the other matchups.
|
My vision doesn't magically stop working at the edges of my primary. IF I've got my area coverd and CAN see some things out of it, how is it a bad thing to offer secondary coverage on that stuff? Again....I've got my area covered properly.
For all we know, the only matchups the C had to cover could have all near the endline with no one above the FT line or at mid-court...naturally leading his vision towards the throwin spot.