[Ed Hickland]

This debate could go on forever. I am going to make this my last post on this subject.

Take a look at James Dixon's column on officiating.com "General Rules Concepts of National Federation" where he excerpts Kyle MeNeely's column on the philosophy of NFHS. Remember, this is the same NFHS that sets high school football rules.

Our job is to provide for the safety of these young men and in some cases women who play the game. Football is a contact sport but, most important, it is a sport where young people are suppose to learn fair play.

I am sure the NFHS, the coaches, the players and their parents want us to insure the safety. The last thing you want is an unnecessary injury to impact the life of a player who has a remaining life expectancy of almost 60 years.

The rules serve as a guide to assist us in keeping fair play and safety in what could be a dangerous game. While I am not certain exactly the interpretation of NFHS on the aforementioned play, my belief is most involved in the game would like a liberal interpretation of the rule because it protects the players.

Check with your local interpreter for his opinion.