[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Yep, they handled it correctly. The DQ'd player was unintentionally allowed to remain in the game for a brief time. The game picks up at the POI after the stoppage to replace him. See 2-11-11 Note 2 for a very similar situation.

HEY MTD, this one's for you!
2004-05 NFHS Basketball Rules Interpretations
SITUATION 3: A1 is fouled by B2 and is awarded two free throws. The foul is B2’s fifth foul. The new trail official reports the fifth foul to Team B’s coach. Before a substitute is made, the lead official incorrectly permits A1 to attempt the first free throw. The officials realize the error and huddle to discuss the situation. RULING: The result of the first attempt shall stand. Team B’s head coach shall be notified of B2’s disqualification. Once B2 has been replaced, A1 shall attempt the second free throw. COMMENT: This is an official’s error and not a correctable-error situation according to Rule 2-10. (2-8-3, 4-14-1, 6-1-2c, 10-5-1d)

Bob Jenkins (primarily to you) and Nevada:

I went back and reread my posts in this thread and cannot for the love of Bob (not Jenkins, personal joke among my two sons and myself) I cannot understand how I disagreed with Bob. I think I meant to agree with Bob that the NCAA rationale is wrong and that the NFHS Ruling is correct. Because Bob and Nevada know my feelings about do overs, there shouldn't be any except for free throw violations. Bob, you are right the NCAA ruling is horse manure and the NFHS is the right one. My only excuse is that my OP post was right after lunch and at my advanced age I should have waited until after I had taken my after lunch nap before making my post.

MTD, Sr.