View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 09, 2008, 01:00pm
Refneck Refneck is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Don't forget that the kid is also bench personnel at the time of the T, since the quarter is over and we are in an intermission. That means that the T is also charged indirectly to the Head Coach and he loses the privilege of the coaching box.
I've had this exact situation and was uncomfortable telling the coach he had to sit the rest of the game. Easy, I know it's the rule. However, I don't think the intent of the seatbelt rule is to punish a coach who's player gets stuck during a moment in the game when they happen to be bench personnel. IMO, the seatbelt rule is designed to punish a coach who can't control his bench area. Seems very ticky-tack for me.
Reply With Quote