Quote:
|
Originally Posted by inigo montoya
My partner and I both agreed that the sub would have to shoot. We just disagreed that the sub was required to replace A1. Because the coach did not want to remove her injured player, should we have offered to let her take a time-out? Or just assume that if the coach wants to take the TO to allowe rher player to stay in, she'll ask for it of her own volition?
|
You could tell the coach the options. That's up to you.
Here is a clear case play which states that either a time-out or a sub was required in your situation and that your partner's opinion is dead wrong.
3.3.5 SITUATION B: A1 appears to be injured and an official properly halts play and the Team A coach rushes onto the court to check A1. However, A1 is OK and seems ready to play within a few seconds. RULING: A1 must be removed as the coach came onto the court. A1 may remain in the game if the coach does not come on the court and A1 is ready to play immediately. If the coach or other bench personnel have come onto the court, the player must be replaced. There is no set amount of time as to what is “immediately,” but it should not involve more than a few seconds and it must be without the coach, trainer or doctor being beckoned and/or entering the court. The coach may also call a time-out to keep the player in the game. (10-4-2)