Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kbilla
OK, but it IS a mechanics change right? That was my point that some others were disputing...my whole thing in all of this was just to make the point that when you are L and the action is coming from the opposite side, don't bail out on it, don't give up on it just b/c it isn't your primary. I agree with others that L should not be reaching across frequently, if he is, then he needs to get his behind over there more....but get wide as L and you can see everything going on, that way you are able to lend help to C on the rare occassion that you haven't rotated and he/she misses one...
|
No it isn't.
As has been said. The drive is officiated, and has been, with the T or C having the on-ball defender with L having secondary/help defenders.
Most B/C happen deep with that help defender. Lead ball-side has a great look at the offense leaving the floor and the guarding position of that help defender. Lead at close down, has a better idea of that help defender coming from their primary on a drive from C, so even without a rotation lead has the best look at the B/C.
The reason for the notation was:
One it's the way everyone was doing it and how it was being taught.
Two they hope it cuts down on blarges if T and C have hits and pushes on ball and lead only has the help defender and B/C.
There is also
nothing in that notation that suggests that lead has the entire paint as you said eariler...in fact, what it says is
EXACTLY what several people had already said and you disagreed with.