Quote:
Originally posted by finnref
Agree with you, Chuck. don't see how Mark can penalize the same action twice. Furthermore, a I understand it, if the intentional contact over the line foul occurred first, that action satisfies the requirement of the warning for merely reaching across the line. Therefore, if the same team subsequently violates by reaching across the plane, it is a T foul and not a warning. This would further support my view that no double foul should be called as per Mark's interpretation.
|
The contact over the line is an intentional personal foul only.Contact with the ball only,or breaking the plane after already being warned would be a T.No "delay of game" warning goes with the intentional PF call.If the same team reaches across the plane again,they will still get a warning before they are assessed a T.That's the language straight out of R9-2Penalty(4) that I quoted before.If you called the intentional personal foul and also gave them a delay-of-game warning on the same play,you would again be penalising a single action twice.