Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jimpiano
Your buddy's first line tells us all we need to know.
|
Yes...that when you said that those things NEVER happened in live broadcasts, you had no idea of what you were talking about or were lying through your teeth.
Try as you might, no one with an ounce of brains will accept your attempt to claim you were right. Your own words prevent that.
Remember these? Everyone else does.
From post #6:
"How in the world can any technology "doctor" sounds in a live event"?
That is called EDTING, but, to do that, it first has to be recorded."
From post #9
"But those sounds cannotbe alterted on a live broadcast."
From post 14
"But TV does not change sounds."
"…sports broadcasts are about giving the viewer the sounds of the game as heard by those in attendance.""
From post 17
"The sounds heard at home may be easier to hear , but they are the same sounds you would hear being close to the action at a live event. They are never altered or changed."
From post 22
"Ah, the capability exists. Certainly it does, but it is not used to change the sounds of the game."
"The swoosh at the tee is what you would hear standing next to Tiger."
From post 23
"I can tell you for a fact that no American network broadcast alters or changes the actual sounds heard at an event."
Trust me, it is the rest of us who are LOL.