View Single Post
  #73 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 10, 2007, 02:03pm
rockyroad rockyroad is offline
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
But simultaneous is not good enough to be a violation...

They must be the last to touch it BEFORE it gains BC status.

They must also be the first to touch it AFTER it gains backcourt status.

The BEFORE requirement is where this fails. Simultaneous doesn't equal before.
Simultaneous, according to the venerable Mr. Webster, means "existing or occuring at the same time"...so the before and after take place at the same time in this scenario...I understand that you don't like the interp., but you really aren't giving a very good argument...the ball has frontcourt status until the moment the player catches it in the backcourt - so the two requirements happen simultaneously.

Anyway...how about them Indians??
Reply With Quote