Thread: A-Rod
View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 08, 2007, 10:27pm
ManInBlue ManInBlue is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 469
Now that makes sense. The interpretation does not include verbal INT. That's the kind of explanation that sinks in. JEA and PBUC do not reference anything verbal (that I could find) which still leads me to my original conclusion, in my own strange thought pattern. Although its omission may be an indicator that it "doesn't exist." However, I shall accept these explanations and accept that the JR makes reference to it.

Thanks, guys.
Reply With Quote