Thread: New Rule
View Single Post
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 28, 2007, 11:36am
lmeadski lmeadski is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 271
Yes, I understand

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1
The arrow entitles them to an alternating possession throw-in, not just "possession" of the ball out of bounds for a throw-in. Since that throw-in wasn't completed, they didn't get what they're entitled to. So the next time the arrow is needed, they are still entitled to that throw-in.
the spirit of this rule. I just don't agree with it. It's funny, for all that agree to this now, there was nary a debate of this prior ot the rule change. Regardless, I stand by my oath to enforce the rules as written.

Having said that, are all of you ready to assess Ts whenever a home player walks on the courts in a yellow home jersey?!
__________________
All of us learn to write in the second grade. Most of us go on to greater things.

Last edited by lmeadski; Sat Jul 28, 2007 at 11:39am.
Reply With Quote