View Single Post
  #43 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 09, 2002, 07:54am
devdog69 devdog69 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 778
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by Bart Tyson
JR, 1st I don't think you are canceling a FT that was never taking. But, I think it is a moot point since the case play gives the procedure as i stated earlier. What is "AR"?
AR is "approved ruling",Bart.I should have been clearer.It just means I'd like to see someone from the FED rules committee issue an interpretation on this.I've ran this by three guys that I know that are rules interpreters in their areas.Two say that I am right-one says I'm wrong.All three say that there is no way that you can have a "delayed dead ball" in this sitch because the whistle killed the original FT if the ball is still in the shooter's hands.The two guys that agreed with me had the same concern that I did.A could commit a subsequent FT violation,giving one violation each way-but A would still get their original FT repeated.
Now that doesn't sit well with me, you are worried that A could commit a violation after the whistle has killed the play and caused a dead ball situation. I don't get it. I have been trying to ignore this and make it go away , now I am going to have to go get my case book, I guess.
__________________
Church Basketball "The brawl that begins with a prayer"
Reply With Quote