View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 02, 2007, 02:15am
fitump56 fitump56 is offline
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In a hut
Posts: 911
Send a message via AIM to fitump56 Send a message via MSN to fitump56 Send a message via Yahoo to fitump56 Send a message via Skype™ to fitump56
Quote:
Originally Posted by RPatrino
I called a balk this past season because the catcher, prior to the pitcher beginning any pitching delivery, moved toward second base and recieved the "pitch" in the vicinity of the top line of the left handed batters box. Of course the coach insisted it was a pitch out, and I told him I saw it differently. Maybe I was splitting hairs, but my thought process revolved around that if every catcher was allowed to move prior to a pitch and receive it 5-10 feet in front of the plate, then no runner would ever steal second again.
Good call and one that makes common sense regardless of the rule interp. If F2 is allowed at will to move before the pitch is either on delivery or leaves hand, this has to be a violation. If not, then let F1 com eset and F2 can position wherever.

Arguing silly semantical ambiguities in rule interps is for umpires who have to go to field with assurance that they have the backing of . so that they can claim superor "knowledge". What a crock.
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to eat reasonably. It wastes your time and the pig will argue that he is fat because of genetics. While drinking a 2.675 six packs a day."
Reply With Quote