Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
You do not have definite knowledge of any kind.
|
This is not exactly true. I agree you do not have definite knowledge of
how much time ran off the clock after the whistle sounded. But you do have definite knowledge that
some time ran off the clock after the whistle sounded.
This is similar to the case in which there is a backcourt throw-in and after you've been in the frontcourt for a few seconds, you recognize that the clock didn't start. I think it was Camron Rust who argued that you should take time off the clock equal to whatever your backcourt count was, because you have definite knowledge that
at least that much time should've come off the clock.
All_Heart is making a similar case, in that you know
at least 0.1 seconds came off the clock, since the whistle definitely came first.
I agree that without seeing the exact amount of time that ran off, we can't fix it in this case.