Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lawump
Tried...I don't like. I know I'm stubborn, but it was just too far out of my comfort zone.
|
If you prefer sore knees or the risk of neck injuries over the "discomfort" of the GDS, then what grounds for complaint have you concerning the former?
One would think that any new stance would take an experienced umpire out of his comfort zone. The issue is whether the advantages of the stance make it worth the trouble reshaping one's comfort zone.
As you probably know but others might not, the risk of neck injuries is significant and the basis of the prohibition of "scissors" among MiLB umpires. Insurers won't cover those who use it. I suspect that this might one day extend to FED, ABUA, and other groups carrying injury insurance for umpires.
MLB umpires may still use it without losing their insurance; I would infer that MLB pays extra premiums to cover the extra risk. Ah, the show!