While I agree that the retired BR had no business being where she was, haven't we said many times here that in order to call interference, there has to be a play that was interfered with?
We cannot determine the reason that F3 did not complete the throw...ie, how close was R1 to home?, did the ball slip in F3s hand, etc.
This play is HTBT at best to see the exact positions of F3, the retired BR, and R1.
I'm just throwing this out for further discussion...I believe that I could justify a call or no-call either way.
__________________
It's what you learn after you think you know it all that's important!
|