[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by todd66

The Fed has issued a case play to illustrate the way the rule is to be implemented. Here is the link: http://www.nfhs.org/web/2006/08/basketball.aspx
Click on the comments to 2007/2008 rule changes and the case play is there.

Yep, straight from the NFHS:

4.42.5 SITUATION: Team A is awarded an alternating-possession throw-in. A1’s throw-in pass is illegally kicked by B2. RULING: As a result of B2’s kicking violation, Team A is awarded a throw-in at the designated spot nearest to where the violation occurred. Since the throw-in was not contacted "legally," the throw-in had not ended. Therefore, the arrow remains with Team A for the next alternating-possession throw-in. (6-4-4)