Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JRutledge
Once again this is just an opinion and I was only taking on your assertion that the NF creates mechanics that everyone should follow.
|
Actually, that only comment that I wrote so far in this thread was that the FED's goal was to have a country-wide consistent set of mechanics. Apparently, if I'm reading the responses to-date correctly in this thread, both the FED and IAABO use the same mechanics. However, you are claiming that IAABO does a
better job of teaching those mechanics, as well as having more/better training materials. All I'm trying to do is find out is exactly
HOW IAABO is doing the better job that you claim they are doing and
what those better training materials are.
I like to think that I have an open mind. If IAABO is doing something better in the training end that the FED is currently doing, as you claim, then I'm certainly not against looking at and evaluating what they're doing. The problem is that no one to date in this thread has been able to tell me exactly
what IAABO is doing better or
how they are doing their training better, other than a computer program that Skippy mentioned.