Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jkumpire
JR,
Sorry, I thought that any list of ways to evaluate umpires was germane to our discussion, as alternatives to a coach's vote. Tersting is not a good way to do it, except maybe as a way to limit the pool of eligible people if resources are not big enough to evaluate a lorger group of people
If I am not contributing to the conversation I am sorry.
|
Calm down, I just wanted to know if this was a made up list or an actual list used by an organization. This is not about contributing to the conversation (of course you are doing that, this is a discussion board), this is about trying discuss is there a better way to do things. I am just contending that even if you have a list, coaches will still have input on some level. In my state their input is just a small part of the process not the entire process. My state makes it very clear they can consider many factors not in our power rating and they even make a list but suggest they are not bound by those factors. If a particular coach sends a specific report about an umpire, it might be a big factor based on what the administrator wants to do.
Peace