View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 30, 2007, 08:55am
BigGuy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy6900
I don't understand what the problem is here. As Bob Jenkins posted
The whole thing is being blown out of proportion and is very simple. The interpretation has been the same for years - if the fielder is lying on the ground, the runner may jump, hurdle or leap over the fielder. It doesn't matter if the fielder is on his back or on his stomach, as long as he is on the ground!

If the fielder is kneeling, bending, standing upright, dancing the jig, or otherwise not lying on the ground, the runner must not attempt to make himself higher than the fielder he is trying to avoid! So, if the fielder is kneeling and stretches out his glove (with the ball) and the runner bounds over the glove, the runner is alright as long as he doesn't make himself higher than the fielder that is kneeling. I realize that is hard for non-FED people to conceive but that is how it is handles. In 35 years of FED, I have never applied this or seen it happen!

The rule was put in place to prevent runners from diving over catchers on their knees trying to make the tag on the 3rd base line (like you see in the movies). The FED chose not to limit it to just diving over the catcher. Again, the players are not drawing a salary, they are amateurs so safety is the first order of business.
ozzy - I don't always agree with you but that was very well said. For the amateurs safety is the biggest concern.
Reply With Quote