Fri May 25, 2007, 09:59am
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NCASAUmp
Asking me? Or everyone else?
I felt that R2 was intentionally (this was 2 years ago, so intent is required) distracting F3, drawing a throw to second base. R1, who was already 10-15' off 3rd, saw the ball go to 2nd, and was getting ready to haul butt home. However, I killed the play before he got far, because the interference had already taken place.
Did that paint a clearer picture of what happened?  |
Yes, this answered the question asked as to where there was a possible play for INT.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
|