Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Old School
... Neither of us have all the information we need to judge here, but I think I have more than you to make a reasonable judgment. I have a injured kid who needed hospitalization, fact. You have the referee's word, unproven, and no one else to substantiate. Yet you are dead sure the referee is not at fault. Well, you don't have enough information to be dead sure. ...
|
Fact: By your own admission there is not enough information or substantiated evidence to make judgement. period. Yet you continue to insinuate that the officials did not do their job completely, thereby allowing a player get assaulted. The fact there is an injury only proves there was an assault, NOT that there was negligence on anyones part. You can dance all around the wording if you like. I have read every post in here and you sir, Old School, have repeatedly said indirectly that the officials were indeed responsible for the assault and any actions taken or not after. This is IMO, unfair to the officials. Since none of us were there, the OP was and therefore has the most credibility. It is with that being said. I take his word at value and make no judgement. I learn from the incident and hope it doesn't happen on my court.