Then I'm misreading your post.
Quote:
|
Only if the timing of the swing was so far apart from the timing of the pitch that it's only purpose could be to interfere, then it's interference. The "intent" here, for want of a better word, had better be crystal clear if you're going to rule no-strike, interference.
|
This is to what I am referring. I still do not see any chance of INT. Remember, the entire premise is for the second swing to occur as the ball is still approaching the plate.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
|