|
Thanks for all the comments, guys.
To all who commented on the stupid (etc.) runner, yes, it was a very contrived play, whose only point was to discuss the legal status of F2.
My call, I am sure, prior to the comment on McGriffs that got me thinking about this, would have been interference (F2 making a slo-mo play, but still a play).
I think that would still be my call unless it was clear that F2 had stopped making a play and was just standing in the base path.
|