Me too, on the above answers, but a question.
If "F2 is still laying on the ground in the vicinity of home plate, R1 is tangled with F2 and is still laying on the ground partially covering home" resulted in R2 being impeded going to the plate:
a) Is "vicinity of home plate" clearly out of R2 path?
b) If the R2 path is blocked by R1, is it because R1 is restrained by F2?
c) If yes to b, should OBS be considered caused by F2?
d) Does F2's positon being injury caused negate anything else?
Aside from this specific case, any general concept comments?
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
|