View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 19, 2007, 11:26am
CecilOne CecilOne is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Question

Me too, on the above answers, but a question.

If "F2 is still laying on the ground in the vicinity of home plate, R1 is tangled with F2 and is still laying on the ground partially covering home" resulted in R2 being impeded going to the plate:

a) Is "vicinity of home plate" clearly out of R2 path?
b) If the R2 path is blocked by R1, is it because R1 is restrained by F2?
c) If yes to b, should OBS be considered caused by F2?
d) Does F2's positon being injury caused negate anything else?

Aside from this specific case, any general concept comments?
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote