View Single Post
  #84 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 30, 2007, 01:20pm
jimpiano jimpiano is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 747
GREYMULE

I am not disputing your call for a rewrite or an exeption to the rule.
I am not saying that the question, as written,should have another answer.

I am saying that the play as described can be resolved within the existing rules without letting a run score.

The rule by the way on interference after being declared out reads
A runner continuing to run and drawing a throw may be considered a form of interference,

In this case the batter is out when the umpire declares infield fly, and his continued running on the play you described would easily fit that interpretation.
Reply With Quote