Thread: 3.1 to 2.0?
View Single Post
  #78 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 23, 2007, 02:34pm
socalreff socalreff is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 314
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomerSooner
The problem that I have with this is that it appears they just made up the 2.0number. I don't see how they came up with definite knowledge that 1.1 seconds came off the clock. Did they play it in real time and use a stop watch? I don't think so, and even if they did, I don't think that is allowed by rule. As the announcers said, "they are just going to have to come up with a number." I think that is exactly what they did.
They used a stopwatch. You can see it in his hand while reviewing.
__________________
"Never mistake activity for achievement."
Reply With Quote