Thread: 3.1 to 2.0?
View Single Post
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 22, 2007, 09:50pm
Dan_ref Dan_ref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomerSooner
I realize that I'm starting to get outlandish, but I'm trying to foster discussion (kinda devil's advocate kinda thing), but the timer could still have started and stopped the clock so quickly that no time change was shown. I've seen it done on clocks that show tenths of a second. I'm just saying.
sigh.

The NCAA rules permit the officials to use the monitor to correct timing errors.

If they determined that 1.1 seconds should have come off when actually zero seconds came off that qualifies as a timing error.
Reply With Quote