View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 21, 2007, 07:32am
Scrapper1 Scrapper1 is offline
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,674
Quote:
Originally Posted by ranjo
Was I correct that the arrow should not have changed? I now think the throw-in was the result of a technical foul penalty and not an alternating posession.
You were correct for NFHS rules. NCAA rules would have shot the FTs and gone to the POI (which was the AP throw-in to start the half).

But since this is AAU, I'm assuming NFHS rules. So the arrow should not have changed.
Reply With Quote