View Single Post
  #90 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 10, 2007, 10:08pm
Nevadaref Nevadaref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Dexter
Just saw the full replay. I didn't get a great look, but it sure didn't look like the C was wearing a PT device.

EDIT: On the last throw-in (with 0.6 on the clock), the T administering the throw had one hand raised and the other was counting. I'm always shocked when conferences (or the NCAA) opt NOT to use Precision Timing when it's available.
Sharp eye, Mark. That should indicate that PT was not being used. Thanks.

PS I have a theory as to how the officials got 0.6 seconds to put back on the clock. I believe that they totally blew it logically. As you can see on the replays the game clock on the top of the backboard shows 0.0 or 0.1 as the ball goes through, so it didn't come from there. In the broadcast the R can be seen with a stopwatch in his right hand while kneeling in front of the monitor. I believe that he timed the interval between the tap on the missed FT and when the clock finally started and came up with 0.6. However, he then mistakenly believed that he had to ADD that time to the game clock instead of SUBTRACT it! So he ordered 0.6 put back and the last throw-in for Akron.

Does that seem plausible to anyone?
Reply With Quote