Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BktBallRef
Then why is it called alternating POSSESSION? 
Evenso, if the foul occurs, then they don;t get their throw-in, do they?
Changing the rule for the sake of making it easier isn't a reason. |
They had their throwin; it resulted in a foul.
You're right, it's not a reason. It's not my reason either.
But, I'm tilting at windmills.