And if a frog had wings.... I know. The difference is that I'm not creating unlikely hypotheticals. Good grief.
I already said I expected disagreement. That's fine. This is just how I see it.
It seems arbitrary to me to reverse the arrow on an offensive violation but not on an offensive foul. To me, the arrow gives the thrower the ball; after that all bets should be off because the arrow did its job. You can't say your punishing the team that got fouled during the throwin because they're still getting the ball that the arrow provided.
This should go without saying, but I'm not out there enforcing it the way I think it should be; I'm enforcing it the way it is.
BTW, had a scorer in a middle school game not change the arrow because the pass was stolen.
We corrected him.