Wed Feb 21, 2007, 04:12pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 132
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
I didn't expect you to; no one else does. It's my opinion that the team is entitled to a throwin, not possession. Once the thrower has been given the ball for the throwin, the arrow's job is done. Anything that happens during that throwin is a direct result of the arrow.
Let me put it another way. In your scenario; the foul to against A2 happened because A1 was trying to inbound the ball. If the arrow hadn't given the ball to A, then B2 wouldn't have fouled. The arrow did its job.
Again, I realize I'm outnumbered here.
|
Huh? I don't get it.
|