View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 15, 2007, 04:07pm
RushmoreRef RushmoreRef is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by mick
Makes sense to me, howie719.
Foul on B1 who caused A1 to contact B2. Shoot two and no foul charged to A1.
Agree here also...I think I read some past posts with this and similar scenarios....some might differ with me but in both situations I previously posted I'm going to try and get out of there with one foul even though the rules might allow something else....
__________________
Do you really think it matters, Eddy?
Reply With Quote