Quote:
|
there's absolutely no reason 10-1-5 can't be used in this situation
|
Except for the fact that it in no way applies, I guess you can't.
Look, in the situation given, that of having additional, non-Fed rules, I *guess* one could say the offense is gaining an advantage by staying in the backcourt if the defense isn't allowed back there. I personally don't think that's an unreasonable interpretation, but then again, I don't know because I don't know how the additional rule is worded. As I again said, there's little to no chance this would happen in a plain Fed rule game, but if it does, its legal.
Nothing to do with legalease. 10-1-5 just doesn't apply.
Does 10-1-5 apply to a offensive team that stands just inside the division line with no defense applying pressure? If not, why would it apply to the backcourt situation described?