View Single Post
  #105 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 30, 2007, 04:04pm
BktBallRef BktBallRef is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
I think that is unrealistic. You want the officials to turn back a game, put the assignor in a bind to change assignments to fill the games? I do not think it is about supporting fellow officials, it is putting themselves in a bad situation if they do such a thing. If they want to support their officials there are other ways to do this. If anything you require the teams be on their best behavior and you penalize any action that might teeter on unsportsmanlike behavior. That sounds like the obvious thing to do, but not very realistic. I might eliminate every game with that assignor and other assignors if I made such a choice.

Peace
I agree. The offiicals will be NCHSAA officials assigned out of the Raliegh area. They have no dog in this fight. Also, this was a judge's court order. The WVSSAC had nothing to do with the TRO. But I did notice that the exceutive director of the WVSSAC is on his way to Huntington today. Hope he lays the law down.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith