View Single Post
  #53 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 26, 2007, 11:03am
Jurassic Referee Jurassic Referee is offline
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Junker
Do we need to start another forum category just on the "blarge". We've hashed this over for a long time, every year. We all know that if good mechanics are followed, you won't end up with this situation. We also know that on occasion it's going to happen. I haven't had it in a game yet, but I know better than to say it will never happen. Most of us would get together and go with whichever call came from the primary. If you can't come to agreement, call them both. It's really not all that complicated.
It also isn't the point of this thread either, Junker. The point isn't that you should never have a blarge or how to avoid a blarge. The point is that if a blarge actually does happen, do you then follow the direction of the applicable rule book, be it NFHS, NCAA Mens or NCAA Womens, which is what you said above that you personally would have done? Or would you follow your own view of how the play should be handled? JoeAdvantage, IRef4Him and MTD Sr. are all basically saying that they would apply the NCAA Womens ruling to all NFHS and NCAA Mens situations, even though both of those ruleset rulings are completely different. Iow, it's the same as applying a FIBA rule to something that happened in a D1 Mens Final Four game, simply because you like the FIBA rule better.

Anyone, feel free to correct me if I mis-read any of those parties' posts, but I think that I interpreted them correctly.

My original question was just simply wondering how everyone feels about JoeAdvantage's (et al) position that the procedure outlined in the cited NFHS case book play should not be followed after a blarge has occurred.

Note that I still haven't given my personal opinion....yet.
Reply With Quote