Quote:
Originally Posted by ncaabbref
I think this is succumming to the "paralysis of over-analysis"...
|
I think that's what PY was saying, also. The state interpreter said that it couldn't be a kick because the ball wasn't "struck" with the leg. But if we're being that literal, then we shouldn't call a held ball in that situation either because it wasn't held with the hands.
Go with the obvious kick call, even if it's not literally "struck" with the leg. I think that was PY's point.