Thread: Eyepoke
View Single Post
  #57 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 04, 2007, 04:24am
armymanjones armymanjones is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
That's not the point. You said that it was was a "good no-call". It was actually a missed foul call. There's a big difference between those two. A missed foul call is never a good no-call.
ok if it was missed do you compound it by calling it on who you think caused the foul?