Thread: Eyepoke
View Single Post
  #35 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 03, 2007, 08:14pm
lorenj lorenj is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tahlequah, OK
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
The difference is there's no evidence of the double dribble after the fact. The other difference is no one is suggesting you call the foul if you didn't at least see the swipe around the face. All we're saying is you don't to see the finger in the eye to call this foul, seeing the swipe is enough.
I agree. From most angles, you aren't going to be able to see the actual contact with the eye. If you only call a foul when you see the actual eye poke, you are going to miss this most of the time.