View Single Post
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 31, 2002, 11:48am
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,106
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

...If there is contact between A1 and B1, then it is easy, blocking foul on A1. If A1 knows that the penalty for flopping is a technical foul, that puts a stop to it right away.
Block on A1? How do you figure that?

That sentence was poorly worded. It has been my experience that A1 usually flops when he/she is in an unfavorable position and is trying to influence the official to call a charging foul on B1. The first time that A1 flops in the scenario that I just described and there in no contact, by rule that is a technical foul for faking being fouled, I discreetly let A1 know that his/her actions are a technical foul and to stop the nonsense. I think that everybody goes that route because it is an obscure techincal foul, very techincal is the best description I can give. But if there is contact, and A1 is not in a favorable position, then A1 is responsible for the contact, and the official should call a blocking foul on A1. I hope this cleared things up for you.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote