Sat Dec 09, 2006, 04:24am
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,004
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle
Hmmm, plenty to think about here. For the first time, the notion of an intentional technical makes sense in HS rules to me now.
|
Good. 
Here is a case book play to further illustrate JR's point.
4.19.5 SITUATION: A1 is fouled by B1. A1 subsequently pushes B1. RULING: If a foul is called on A1, it must be either an intentional or flagrant technical. If it is ruled flagrant, A1 must be disqualified. If A1's contact during a dead ball was neither intentional nor flagrant, it should have been ignored. (4-19-1 Note; 10-3-9)
|