[Joeman]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the replay has to show conclusive evidence to overturn the call on the field, which would give Walt Coleman the discretion as to call it a fumble or incomplete pass. He did not have conclusive evidence or the subject would not be so hotly debated on every football forum I've been to.

I feel the rule should be changed to make it more clearly defined, like "If the ball is in forward motion and is still above the passers shoulder(indicating his continued intention to pass) and it is jarred free, it is an incomplete pass. If the ball is in foreward motion below the passers shoulder(indicating his intention to tuck it away), and it is jarred loose it is a fumble.

No debating it this way huh?

And no Mark, I don't have a white hat either.

Joe.