View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 28, 2006, 09:22am
Dan_ref Dan_ref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1
It absolutely applies, but it doesn't say that a hard foul from behind MUST be flagrant. It says if the contact is severe, it should be flagrant, otherwise intentional. And from the one angle I saw, with no replay, I said it didn't look severe. But I didn't see him get pulled down or his head hit the basket support. After hearing about the full extent of the contact, I agree with the officials totally. I was in no way trying to say that they blew the call.
I didn't mean to start a pissing match on this but the recently departed Mr Annoying Grammar/Spelling/Useless Trivia Guy would have been the first to note that while you insist on using the word 'should' the wording of the major concern uses the word 'shall'.

As I say I didn't see the play so I have no opinion, I'm just putting this new bit of information out there. How you misinterpret it is up to you :shrug:
Reply With Quote