Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JRutledge
If you advocate an out for the officials then you eliminate prevention of this in my opinion. The coach that did not get the call has more reason to ***** about the call. At least the NF and NCAA Men's say that if the officials make this call we are going to give this a double foul. It is harder for a coach to complain in my opinion. They might not like it, but at least they do not feel the officials completely screwed them. If officials know they are only going to go with one of the calls, then screw it if I signal something I saw (without the appropriate communication) because it will not matter either way. Now that is my opinion, it does not mean you have to agree.
Peace
|
Evidently your way isn't working because the men are still having problems with calling the blarge even though the men don't advocate getting together and get the call right.The point is you will never, never prevent it. Nobody is advocating it. To be honest nobody wants it to happen.
If you call a double foul in this scenario then @ least one of the coaches is going to be pissed. Especially if he/she thinks that their player was the player that didn't foul. I agree that either way one of the coaches is going to be upset. I just don't think that by getting together and calling the right call is going to upset both coaches. Both coaches are more likely to be upset if you call the double foul. This is why the women went to getting together and getting the call correct. Why penalize both players?