Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M Guy
I'm asking if you would correct a partner's interpretation of a rule. If a partner tells you the ball hit the support, and they ruled it still in play, would you let it go? If a partner tells you they ruled a shot a 3-pointer because the shooter's foot wasn't completely within the line, but only on the line, would you just let it go? Remember, in both cases, there has been a TO already called for the crew to discuss this. I'm not asking you to stop play to find out what your partner called. either.
|
Sigh....
Apples and watermelons again.
The first case is a missed violation. There is no rule that says you can hop in your Wayback Machine, go back in time and call missed violations.
The second case is a correctable error. See case book plays 2-10-1SitF&G.
Apples and watermelons----a non-correctable missed violation vs. a correctable error. One isn't covered under the rules; one is.